Imagine a morning when nothing is secure anymore.
Your Bitcoin wallet is empty. Your bank was powerless. Your passwords are public. The internet works – but nobody dares to use it anymore. Encrypted connections no longer exist. Every secret is revealed.
What sounds like a dystopian thriller is a mathematically inevitable future: the post-quantum era. Not a question of if, but when.
Shor's Algorithm: The Grim Reaper of Encryption
At the center of this threat stands one name: Shor. His algorithm solves fundamental problems of classical cryptography in seconds – provided a powerful quantum computer is available:
Factorization of large numbers (RSA broken)
Discrete logarithms (Elliptic curves broken)
Signature schemes like ECDSA (private keys derivable)
What would take 2¹⁰⁰⁰ years today can then be computed in minutes with around 4000 error-corrected qubits.
Store Now – Decrypt Later: The Invisible Time Bomb
The real danger begins right now. Attackers can collect encrypted data today – financial transactions, chats, emails – and decrypt them later once the technology becomes available. A global surveillance attack on time.
Example: A Monero transaction from 2024 can be exposed in 2040 – despite once being considered “private”.
The Selective Collapse: Who Survives?
The quantum apocalypse doesn't affect everyone equally. Some cryptocurrencies are more vulnerable, others structurally more robust:
Post-Quantum-Coins (still in development): Promises without maturity.
Bitcoin: Secure only for unspent coins – every spend makes vulnerable.
Ethereum: Public from day 1 – perfect target.
Monero & Zcash: Strong today, completely exposed tomorrow.
Mimblewimble: No shield – but a shadow.
Irony: Privacy coins like Monero or Zcash, which promise anonymity, store large amounts of cryptographic data for this purpose – a feast for future quantum attackers.
Monero: Ring signatures become unique identifiers.
Zcash: zk-SNARKs lose their security with the fall of elliptic curves.
Mimblewimble: Invisible Instead of Unbreakable
Mimblewimble is not quantum-secure – but structurally resilient. It doesn't protect through impenetrable walls, but through ephemeral architecture. What isn't stored can't be broken.
1. No Permanent Public Keys
Where Bitcoin knows static addresses, Mimblewimble only has one-time, fleeting key pairs. No address history, no targets. A quantum attacker sees – nothing.
2. Minimal Attack Surface
While Monero and Zcash store permanent cryptographic proofs, Mimblewimble restricts itself to the essentials:
Pedersen Commitments (UTXOs)
Schnorr Signatures (Kernels)
No extra metadata. No archives. No incriminating past.
3. Cut-Through: Cryptographic Forgetting
The key to resilience is forgetting.
Spent outputs are removed through cut-through. The blockchain only stores the current state. No history for tomorrow's quantum computer.
Example:
Alice sends a payment in 2024.
In 2025, the output is used again.
Cut-through deletes old data.
In 2040, nothing exists that a quantum computer could analyze.
4. Rolling Security: A Shedding Snake
Every new transaction replaces old cryptographic material. The blockchain renews itself continuously. No permanent identity. No archive to penetrate.
Adaptability: Evolution Instead of Demolition
The real strength of Mimblewimble lies not in resistance, but in the ability to adapt.
Currently, Mimblewimble uses secp256k1 (elliptic curve) – an attack target for Shor. But: The commitment scheme is exchangeable. The architecture remains.
An image: Other blockchains are concrete bunkers. If the structure becomes unsafe, it must be demolished. Mimblewimble, however, is a flexible building – the lock can be changed without altering the structure.
Three Phases for Post-Quantum Migration
Hybrid Operation
Classical and post-quantum commitments run in parallel. Users decide per transaction.
Gradual Migration
Through natural usage and cut-through, old data disappears from the chain, new commitments take over.
Post-Quantum Operation
The chain runs completely on new, quantum-secure methods – old structures are gone.
Conclusion: No revolution. A controlled shedding.
Final Conclusion: No Immunity. But Resilience.
Mimblewimble is not a magic shield against quantum attacks. But it shows how a minimalist, forgetting approach can survive better than over-complex systems with maximum transparency.
In a world where everything can be decrypted, perhaps the best defense is:
Leaving nothing behind that can be decrypted.
And knowing that you can change the lock cylinder – before someone finds the master key.
https://youtu.be/pDj1QhPOVBo?si=Z2AW-m_3uqFvk_5y
At the moment quantum computing in fact is a non existent threat. They still miss a fundamental brick : to be able to read multi state at once. They barely are extracting two state (thus two calculations among many) for very specific calculations right now. And they still are not even researching this field because the most difficult. A superbe YT video has been made "why I left quantum computing" or something like that. Shrodinger's cat is tortured in the box, but you can pick only one state ate the end, thus no threat at all.
As a scientist I'm more afraid of mathematical improvment or if they make a shor dedicated analog computer boosting numeric computers.