Quantum entanglement refers to a phenomenon in quantum mechanics in which two or more particles correlate with each other in such a way that the state of one particle cannot be described independently of the state of the others, even if they are separated by large distances.
While Einstein famously called quantum entanglement "spooky action at a distance," since the particles seemed to be communicating faster than the speed of light, he and many other scientists acknowledged the potential for the presence of unknown properties - dubbed hidden variables - almost a hundred years ago.
In the context of blockchains, the question arises as to whether quantum entanglement could play a role. However, it is important to understand that quantum entanglement works at the level of individual particles, while blockchains work with macroscopic data structures and are pure information and not matter.
What seems absurd at first glance is worth a closer look. If you are convinced that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies will play a significant role in the future, and all developments point to this, it makes sense to consider whether there could be a dependency or correlation between individual blockchains from which you can gain an advantage.
A simple dependency is that capital that flows into one blockchain is no longer available to another. However, this is not the point here. BTC is and remains the undisputed locomotive of the entire crypto landscape, which, despite its well-known shortcomings, need not fear competition for the time being. Since its foundation in 2009, many other cryptocurrencies besides Bitcoin have disappeared just as quickly as they appeared.
According to its inventor, Bitcoin was intended to be an electronic online peer-to-peer payment system that does not rely on third parties. The fact that it is now mainly used as a store of value, as "digital gold", is only of secondary importance. Things are often used for something other than what they were originally developed for. The best-known example is Viagra, which showed a particular side effect during clinical trials as a hypertension drug, for which it is used today.
So what kind of dependence on another blockchain could you imagine with Bitcoin that you could use to your own advantage? We are not talking about the threat posed by the development of quantum computers, which affects all cryptocurrencies, but a very specific blockchain that can be described as Bitcoin's private twin due to its identical DNA but completely different technical implementation.
With its 100% Satoshi’s Bitcoin DNA, EPIC Cash is this largely unknown private twin of Bitcoin. Equipped with the latest technology, it embodies exactly what Satoshi Nakamoto described in the white paper: a private online peer-to-peer payment system that works without a middleman. With the revolutionary Mimblewimble protocol, EPIC provides exactly what BTC itself unfortunately lacks: privacy and scalability.
Anyone who already owns Bitcoin should consider whether it makes sense to exchange a smaller proportion of their Bitcoin investment for EPIC Cash. Fluctuations in the Bitcoin price of 5-10% are the norm. If only 5% of the capital tied up in Bitcoin is exchanged for EPIC Cash, this does not represent a major risk for the overall Bitcoin assets, but can be an incredible booster.
With simple math and probability, this is very easy to illustrate. How likely is it that Bitcoin with a market capitalization of over USD 1 trillion will double and how likely is it that EPIC Cash with a market capitalization of only USD 3.5 million will increase a hundredfold? How much capital is needed to achieve the corresponding multiplications in market capitalization?
The question is not quite as trivial as it appears at first glance, because only a fraction of the market capitalization itself is required to double the market capitalization. However, the ratio remains the same: doubling the market capitalization of BTC requires orders of magnitude more capital than increasing the market capitalization of EPIC by a factor of 100 or even 1000. A fact that is worth taking a closer look at.
As always, there is a risk when big profits beckon. With EPIC Cash, which carries the Bitcoin DNA in its purest form and has a strong community of convinced supporters and idealists behind it, the risk is manageable. Every Bitcoin investor is well advised to take a closer look at Bitcoin's private twin EPIC, because in the wake of ever-increasing surveillance, privacy will almost certainly be increasingly sought after by investors.
While quantum entanglement, for the longest time, was talked about at particle level, there are cases where this mysterious connection in the non-local dimension appears to be applicable to much more complex systems, synthetic constructs, and even human beings.
Bitcoin and its private twin EPIC Cash are inextricably linked by the Bitcoin DNA. There is a dependency that goes beyond the truism mentioned above, namely that capital that flows into one cryptocurrency is no longer available to another.
What we do know with absolute certainty is that we do not know everything, but looking at empirical evidence we perceive many connections between seemingly unconnected or even unconnectable things and events.
Anyone who takes a closer look at the similarities and differences between Bitcoin and its private twin EPIC will be able to use this to their advantage with the right risk management.
For more information, visit www.epiccash.com
Well, it's a little far fetched to juxtapose both cryptos blockchains. One has private adresses, the other do not. One does not forget a thing (being a target for states/mafias), the other has "cut-though" that makes it a complete different object. Just sizes for a given number of transactions are so different you can't compare them. There might be (crossed) influences though. Like when states will start ranconning people based on their KYC data : btc will really suffer and MW cryptos are going to soar.
Tilman, I guess many people out there are lazy reading (even if they should). Do you have some podcast "synthetic voice" of your articles on youtube, odysee or some other platforms ?
You deserve paternity of your articles so that's up to you to do it. If you don't have time and feel free to have some other people around to translate+make (synth voice or not) audios/videos+upload them, notify us all please.